Skip to main content

NC State Extension

2019 NC & VA Pumpkin Cultigen Evaluations

en Español

El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.

Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.

English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.

Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.

Collapse ▲

2019 Northeast North Carolina and Southeast Virginia On Farm Pumpkin Cultigen Evaluation Study

Principal Investigators

Erin R. Eure, Area Specialized Agent, Commercial Fruits & Vegetables, N.C. Cooperative Extension, Northeast Region Gatesville, NC 27938;
Roy Flanagan, Agriculture and Natural Resources Extension Agent, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Beach, Virginia Beach, VA 23456;
Nettie Baugher, Area Extension Agent, Commercial Horticulture, N.C. Cooperative Extension, Gates, Chowan, Perquimans, Gatesville, NC 27938
Joshua Holland, Agriculture and Natural Resources Extension Agent, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Southampton , Courtland, VA 23837;
Jonathan Schultheis, Professor and Extension Specialist, Vegetables, Department of Horticultural Science, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.

General Cultural Practices

The pumpkin cultigen study was replicated by location: two replications planted on beds in no-till wheat straw with overhead irrigation in Edenton NC; one replication planted flat on non-irrigated bare-ground in Newsoms, VA; one replication planted flat on non-irrigated bare-ground in Virginia Beach, VA.


We gratefully acknowledge the cooperation and assistance of Fred Smith, A.J. Smith & Sons, Edenton, NC, Chris Drake, Sandy Point Farms, Newsoms, VA, and Mike Cullipher, Cullipher Farms, Virginia Beach, VA in helping establish and maintain the pumpkin cultigen study. Additionally we would like to thank Paul Smith, Matthew Leary, Sue Colucci and Jonathan Wilks for their assistance in planting, harvesting, and evaluating the study. We would also like to acknowledge the following seed companies for their cooperation and support: HM Clause Seed Company; Hybrid; Johnny’s Seeds; Rupp Seeds, Inc.; Sakata Seed Company; Syngenta. We also want to acknowledge, support for this study was provided by the US Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, for the CucCAP Specialty Crop Research Initiative grant under award number 2015-51181-24285.


This publication presents data from the cultigen study conducted during 2019. Information contained in this report is believed to be reliable but should not be relied upon as a sole source of information. Limited accompanying detail is included but excludes some pertinent information, which may aid interpretation.


In 2018, North Carolina ranked 4th in pumpkin production in the US, with an estimated 4,500 acres grown in the state. The economic value of the pumpkin crop in North Carolina was reported to be more than 15 million dollars in 2016. In Virginia, pumpkins are one of the top 20 commodities and are grown on over 2,000 acres, accounting for over 11 million dollars in gross receipts. The crop carries a significant value to producers in both states, and it appears production of this commodity is increasing in both North Carolina and Virginia. In the western part of NC, pumpkin production is extensive due to the favorable climate of the region, and likely represents 60% or more of the total acreage in the state. For more than a decade, North Carolina State University has partnered with the University of Tennessee on collaborative pumpkin cultigen evaluation studies in these mountain regions. Virginia Tech conducted similar studies in past years, including study locations in the west and eastern part of Virginia, as well as a location in eastern North Carolina. The eastern region studies have not been conducted since 2017, and with pumpkin acreage continuing to rise in this region, this study sought to build off of that data and continue to look at how current and new cultigens perform in the hotter, more humid climate of southeastern VA and northeastern NC. Due to the difference in climate, eastern growers must approach pumpkin production slightly different than western growers. Cultivars that yield well with high quality in the west may not respond the same in the east. Due to the climatic differences, eastern growers seek cultivars with higher heat tolerance and disease resistance. The focus of this study was to evaluate current and new pumpkin cultigens in the 30 to 40 count bin size class (15-20 lbs.) as this is currently where demand is highest. A few recently released smaller cultivars (10-15 lbs.) were also included in the study due to their high yields, uniform fruits, and high quality (i.e. attractive orange color, strong stem handle) in the 2018 western region study. The cultigens in this study were mainly evaluated for yield and size. However, each entry was also rated for shape, color, suturing, handle characteristics, and fruit size measurements.

Materials and Methods

‘Kratos’ and ‘Orange Sunrise’ were included in this study as grower standards for the 30-40 count bin size. A total of 15 entries were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Two replications were planted at the Edenton location, one in Newsoms, and one in Virginia Beach. Each plot measured 20 feet long with 5 plants spaced 4 feet apart in-row and 6 feet apart between-row. The Edenton plots were planted on June 6, 2019, the Newsoms plot on June 24, and the Virginia Beach plot on July 2. Each plot was evaluated at 1 and 2 weeks after planting to ensure a full stand of five plants per plot. Pumpkins were harvested one time at each site, starting on August 27, 2019 (81 days after planting (DAP)) in Edenton, followed by September 17 (85 DAP) in Newsoms and September 23 (83 DAP) in Virginia Beach. Yield per acre was calculated by extrapolating total yield from the 120 ft2 area of each plot. Five representative fruit from each plot were measured to find the average weight, length and width of each cultigen. Pumpkin color, shape and suturing, as well as handle length, thickness and attachment were rated subjectively for each plot. For a detailed description of how each quality parameter was measured, see Table 2 footnotes.


Yield reductions may have occurred due to virus infection at two of the field sites and lack of timely rainfall at one of the non-irrigated sites. Yields above 16 tons per acre were obtained with Bayhorse Gold, Kratos, Orange Sunrise, and RPX 6208 (Table 1). Cultigens producing the highest fruit numbers, above 2,500 fruit per acre were Carbonado Gold, Kratos, Orange Sunrise, and Skidoo Gold. Skidoo Gold produced nearly 1000 more fruit per acre than any of the other entries. Most pumpkin fruit were smaller than advertised size in the catalog or according to seed company representatives, and this was likely due to various stresses (heat, moisture, and virus disease) at some of the study locations. Only two cultigens achieved an average size of greater than 15 pounds: Bayhorse Gold and SPU 3269. These data may suggest that under heat and/or disease stress conditions, a large sized fruit may still be obtained. Some of the smaller size pumpkin cultivar entries in this study(<10 lbs) were Early Prince, Gumdrop, and Skidoo Gold.

Fruit shapes were mostly round with the exception of Jason and RPX 6208 which were the tallest two cultigens (Table 2). All cultigens evaluated were orange in color, however Orange Sunrise was notably a brighter orange, while Gumdrop and Thor were more of a burnt orange. Cultigens with superior handle quality ratings (thickness, length and attachment) were Gumdrop, Kratos, Orange Sunrise and SPU3269.

Table 1. Pumpkin and gourd cultigen evaluation study. Cumulative yield (tons) / acre, fruit number per acre, and average fruit weight. On Farm Locations, NC and VA 2019.


Seed Company


Average Fruit Weight (lbs)

Yield (tons) / Acre

Number of Fruit / Acre

Bayhorse Gold Rupp Seeds Inc. 17.7 2360 15.1
Carbonado Gold Rupp Seeds Inc. 14.7 2632 11.2
Diablo Sakata 11.2 1634 14.0
Early Prince Syngenta 11.2 2360 9.5
Gumdrop Johnny’s Selected Seed 7.2 1724 8.4
Jason Hybrid 8.5 1452 12.0
Kratos HM Clause 17.8 2632 13.7
Magic Lantern HM Clause 15.3 2450 12.5
Orange Sunrise HM Clause 16.4 2632 12.4
RPX 6208 Rupp Seeds Inc. 16.7 2269 14.6
RPX 6209 Rupp Seeds Inc. 13.0 2360 11.0
Skidoo Gold Rupp Seeds Inc. 15.6 3539 9.3
SPU3269 Sakata 15.6 1997 15.6
Thor Sakata 13.9 2178 12.9
Zeus HM Clause 9.0 1634 10.9
Average 13.6 2257 12.2
LSD (0.05) 4.4 892 2.4

Table 2. Pumpkin and gourd cultigen evaluation study. Fruit and quality measurements for replicated cultigens. On Farm Locations, NC and VA 2019.






Vine Health

Bayhorse Gold 6.3 4.9 5.8 5.0 6.0
Carbonado Gold 6.8 5.4 6.3 6.3 6.2
Diablo 6.3 4.5 5.8 4.8 6.5
Early Prince 5.1 5.3 3.8 3.5 6.2
Gumdrop 7.1 4.9 6.8 7.4 6.0
Jason 5.8 6.3 6.0 6.0 6.1
Kratos 5.6 5.8 4.5 5.1 5.6
Magic Lantern 6.6 5.1 5.0 5.3 6.0
Orange Sunrise 4.4 5.8 5.4 6.0 6.2
RPX 6208 6.3 7.6 6.0 6.9 6.0
RPX 6209 5.8 5.0 6.6 6.6 6.0
Skidoo Gold 5.9 5.0 5.3 5.3 6.0
SPU3269 5.0 4.6 6.3 6.4 6.2
Thor 7.6 5.1 6.1 6.4 6.2
Zeus 6.1 6.0 5.3 6.0 6.0
Average 6 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.1
LSD (0.05)8 1.1 0.7 1.0 1.2 0.7










Bayhorse Gold 4.5 7.0 5.0 9.3 8.6 1.1
Carbonado Gold 5.3 7.1 6.0 8.3 7.8 1.1
Diablo 5.1 5.8 6.4 8.9 9.3 1.0
Early Prince 4.3 5.4 5.0 8.1 7.9 1.0
Gumdrop 6.8 7.3 5.8 7.3 7.2 1.0
Jason 3.3 6.5 6.3 9.3 7.9 1.2
Kratos 6.8 6.6 6.6 9.7 8.3 1.2
Magic Lantern 4.0 5.0 5.8 9.3 8.1 1.2
Orange Sunrise 6.4 5.0 7.3 9.6 8.9 1.1
RPX 6208 6.3 6.9 4.4 10.3 8.1 1.3
RPX 6209 4.8 6.5 6.1 8.3 7.6 1.1
Skidoo Gold 5.8 5.4 4.4 7.3 7.6 1.0
SPU3269 8.4 6.5 7.0 8.9 9.2 1.0
Thor 4.6 5.4 7.0 9.0 8.3 1.1
Zeus 4.4 5.5 5.5 9.3 8.4 1.1
Average 5.4 6.1 5.9 8.9 8.2 1.1
LSD (0.05)8 1.0 1.3 1.5 0.8 1.0 0.1

1 Color Scale: 1 = yellow, 5 = orange, 9 = burnt orange.
2 Fruit Shape Rating: 1 = flat, 5 = round, 9 = tall.
3 Fruit Suturing: 1 = none, 5 = medium, 9 = deep.
4 Texture Rating: 1 = smooth, 5 = semi-rough, 9= rough.
5 Vine Health Rating: 1 = poor, 9 = excellent.
6 Handle Rating: Thickness: 1 = thin, 5 = medium, 9 = thick. Length: 1 = short, 5 = medium, 9 = long. Attachment: 1 = poor, 5 = average, 9 = excellent.
7 Fruit Measurements = Individual length and width values (inches) were taken from 5 fruit per replication, (20 total), The LD ratio was determined by dividing fruit length by fruit width.

View images of 15 varieties of pumpkins in the PDF booklet.