2016 North Carolina and Tennessee Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations
go.ncsu.edu/readext?649384
en Español / em Português
El inglés es el idioma de control de esta página. En la medida en que haya algún conflicto entre la traducción al inglés y la traducción, el inglés prevalece.
Al hacer clic en el enlace de traducción se activa un servicio de traducción gratuito para convertir la página al español. Al igual que con cualquier traducción por Internet, la conversión no es sensible al contexto y puede que no traduzca el texto en su significado original. NC State Extension no garantiza la exactitud del texto traducido. Por favor, tenga en cuenta que algunas aplicaciones y/o servicios pueden no funcionar como se espera cuando se traducen.
Português
Inglês é o idioma de controle desta página. Na medida que haja algum conflito entre o texto original em Inglês e a tradução, o Inglês prevalece.
Ao clicar no link de tradução, um serviço gratuito de tradução será ativado para converter a página para o Português. Como em qualquer tradução pela internet, a conversão não é sensivel ao contexto e pode não ocorrer a tradução para o significado orginal. O serviço de Extensão da Carolina do Norte (NC State Extension) não garante a exatidão do texto traduzido. Por favor, observe que algumas funções ou serviços podem não funcionar como esperado após a tradução.
English
English is the controlling language of this page. To the extent there is any conflict between the English text and the translation, English controls.
Clicking on the translation link activates a free translation service to convert the page to Spanish. As with any Internet translation, the conversion is not context-sensitive and may not translate the text to its original meaning. NC State Extension does not guarantee the accuracy of the translated text. Please note that some applications and/or services may not function as expected when translated.
Collapse ▲Horticulture Series #216
Principal Investigators
Jonathan R. Schultheis, Professor and Vegetable Extension Specialist, Department of Horticultural Science, NC State University and Annette L. Wszelaki, UT Vegetable Extension Specialist, Department of Plant Science, University of Tennessee
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Kaleb Rathbone (Superintendent), John Eric Freeman (Horticultural Crops Supervisor) and other supporting personnel at the Mountain Research Station, Waynesville, NC, for their help in establishing, maintaining, and harvesting the pumpkin cultivar evaluation trial. Additionally, we would like to thank the University of Tennessee and North Carolina State University student workers for assisting with various aspects of the trial and the Tuscola High School agriculture students for their help with harvest.
We want to acknowledge the following seed companies for their cooperation and support: Abbott & Cobb, Inc.; DP Seed; Enza Zaden USA; HM Clause Seed Company; Johnny’s Selected Seeds; Rupp Seeds, Inc.; and Sakata Seed Company. We also want to acknowledge Joy Smith for conducting the statistical analysis on the data collected in this trial. Finally, we want to acknowledge, support for this study was provided by the US Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, for the CucCAP Specialty Crop Research Initiative grant under award number 2015-51181-24285.
Disclaimer: This publication presents data from the cultivar evaluation trial conducted during 2016. Information contained in this report is believed to be reliable but should not be relied upon as a sole source of information. Limited accompanying detail is included but excludes some pertinent information, which may aid interpretation. View the pdf version of the 2016 pumpkin cultivar evaluations.
General Cultural Practices
The pumpkin cultivar evaluation trial was grown on black plastic mulch and fertigated using drip tape. Pesticides used on all plots were chemicals labeled for that crop, (2016 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual).
Introduction
In 2016, the USDA- National Agricultural Statistics Service reported that planted acres of pumpkin for North Carolina and Tennessee was 3,800 and 1,900 acres, respectively. The economic value of the pumpkin crop in North Carolina was reported to be more than 15 million dollars in 2016. Although the crop carries a significant value to producers in both states the total planted acres is still modest when compared to other commodities grown within each state. In the western part of North Carolina and in pockets of Tennessee, pumpkin production is extensive
due to the favorable climate and soils of the region. Collaborative pumpkin cultivar evaluation trials have been conducted by North Carolina State University and the University of Tennessee for about a decade. The advantage of growing pumpkin in areas of higher elevation is the cooler growing conditions where growers seem to experience less disease pressure, a point that Travis Birdsell, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Agent, highlighted in a CALS news story. According to the USDA Economic research service, consumer demand for specialty varieties has been increasing in recent years. The pumpkin cultivars included in this trial were mainly evaluated for yield. However, each cultivar was also rated for shape, color, suturing, vine habit, handle characteristics, and fruit size measurements. The fruit obtained from each replicated cultivar are also identified in a photograph. Several other cultivars were also included in the trial as observation plots (non-replicated) and most of these cultivars are identified in a photograph where available.
Materials and Methods
This trial was conducted at the Mountain Research Station in Waynesville, NC, and was a collaboration between North Carolina State University and the University of Tennessee. Seeds were planted on 21 June 2016. A total of 56 cultivars were evaluated, with 18 cultivars being un-replicated and for observational purposes only. The remaining 25 cultivars were evaluated in a randomized complete block (RCB) trial with 3 replications. Each plot measured 20 feet long with 6 plants spaced 3 feet apart (in-row) and row spacing was 10 ft (between-row).
Plant bed preparation included pre-plant fertilizer (250 lb/acre 12-21-21 and 21-0-0 at 380 lb/acre) broadcast applied and incorporated into the beds on 16 June before laying plastic mulch, providing 110 lb N, 53 lb P and 53 lb of K per acre. Fertigation with 50 lb KNO3 (13-0-44) was applied through drip irrigation on 25 July 2016; 12 and 19 August; 2 and 9 September 2016. A total of 117 lb/acre N, 53 lb/acre P and 75 lb/acre Kwas applied to the trial site throughout the entire growing season.
Insecticides were only applied when needed and were applied at labeled rates for pumpkin production in North Carolina. The fungicide program implemented included the following products which were alternated to reduce potential for development of disease resistance: Actiguard, Cabrio, Previcur Flex, Presidio, Pristine, Procure, Radiant, Ranman, Quadris and Quintec. These products are registered for use in this crop and were applied according to labeled rates that can be referenced in the North Carolina Agriculture Chemical Manual. Fungicides were applied every 7 to 14 days throughout the growing season beginning 8 July 2016 and repeated on the following dates: 15 and 29 July; 5, 12 and 26 September; 8 and 16 August 2016. Herbicides, Dual (1pt/ac) and Command (1pt/ac), were sprayed for weed control on 21 June 2016. Pumpkins were harvested on 6 October (107 days after planting). Yield per acre was calculated by extrapolating total yield from the 200 ft2 area of each plot. Five representative fruit from each plot were measured to find the average length and width of each cultivar. Pumpkin color, shape, and suturing; and handle length, thickness and attachment were rated subjectively for each plot.
Results
Pumpkin entries are discussed by size class and are organized in tables in alphabetical order. Results mentioned in the paragraphs below only correspond to the replicated cultivars.
Mini
Four cultivars were evaluated in the mini size class (≤ 5.0 lbs). Jack Sprat, Orangita and Sirius Star were all orange, while Casperita was white. Average fruit size ranged from 0.9 lbs for Casperita to 2.7 lbs for Jack Sprat (Table 1). The smallest fruit were produced by Casperita, while fruit size of Orangita and Sirius Star were very similar. Jack Sprat produced the largest fruit in the mini size category. Orangita produced the least total yield at 11.7 tons/acre and Sirius Star was the highest yielding cultivar in the mini size category at 32.7 tons/acre. Fruit shapes were mostly round with the exception of Orangita which is slightly flat to round. (Table 2). Casperita maintained its pure white color for several weeks before turning pale yellow.
Small
Four cultivars were evaluated in the ‘small’ size class (5.1 – 10.0 lbs). Fruit of these entries are all orange. Fruit size averages between 5.1 to 6.7 lbs with Field Trip being the smallest, followed by Early Abundance. ACR 1428 and Darling produced fruit with an average weight of 6.7 lbs (Table 1). These entries ranged between 10,003 (Early Abundance) and 15,165 (Darling) fruit number per acre. Field Trip ranked second in fruit per acre at 11, 293 followed by ACR 1428 that produced 10,567 fruit per acre. Darling had the highest total fruit weight and yield of all of the entries in the ‘small’ size category (Table 1). Fruit shapes range from flat to round (Field Trip) to Darling that is slightly taller and less round.
Medium
Eleven cultivars were evaluated in the ‘medium’ size class (10.1-25.0 lbs). Average fruit size in this category ranged between 13.9 to 24.1 lbs per fruit (Table 1). Eagle City Gold produced the highest fruit yield and fruit number in this size category. Fruit yields ranged from 40.6 tons/acre (ACR 7599) to 80.8 tons/acre (Ares). Ares produced the least fruit number per acre (4,840) and Eagle City Gold produced the greatest number of fruit per acre at 9,196 (Table 1). All fruit in this size category are orange with the exception of Blue Doll and Indian Doll (Figure 1). Fruit shapes range from slightly flat to round (Blue Doll and Indian Doll) to Ares, a taller pumpkin (Table 2).
Large
Figure 1. Pumpkin photographs start on page 6 of the pdf booklet.
Table 1. Pumpkin cultivar evaluation trial. Cumulative yield (tons) / acre, fruit number per acre and average fruit weight, Waynesville, NC, 2016.
Mini Size Class (≤ 5.0 lb)
Cultivar |
Seed Company |
Cumulative Yield (tons) / Acre |
Cumulative Number of Fruit / Acre |
Cumulative Average Fruit Weight (lbs) |
Casperita | DP Seed | 12.3 | 26,862 | 0.9 |
Jack Sprat | Sakata | 22.4 | 16,779 | 2.7 |
Orangita | DP Seed | 11.7 | 18,634 | 1.4 |
Sirius Star | Rupp | 32.7 | 27,185 | 2.4 |
Average | 19.8 | 22,365 | 1.9 | |
LSD (0.05) | 11.3 | 9,802 | 0.8 |
Small size Class (5.1 – 10.0 lb)
Cultivar |
Seed Company |
Cumulative Yield (tons) / Acre |
Cumulative Number of Fruit / Acre |
Cumulative Average Fruit Weight (lbs) |
ACR 1428 | Abbott & Cobb | 35.3 | 10,567 | 6.7 |
Darling | Abbott & Cobb | 50.7 | 15,165 | 6.7 |
Early Abundance | Abbott & Cobb | 32.0 | 10,003 | 6.4 |
Field Trip | Harris Moran | 28.5 | 11,293 | 5.1 |
Average | 36.6 | 11,757 | 6.2 | |
LSD (0.05) | 8.2 | 2,724 | 0.4 |
Medium Size class (10.1 – 25.0 lb)
Cultivar |
Seed Company |
Cumulative Yield (tons) / Acre |
Cumulative Number of Fruit / Acre |
Cumulative Average Fruit Weight (lbs) |
Ares | Harris Moran | 80.8 | 6,776 | 24.1 |
ACR 7599 | Abbott & Cobb | 40.6 | 5,566 | 14.6 |
Bayhorse Gold | Rupp | 51.2 | 5,485 | 18.8 |
Bellatrix | Enza Zaden | 68.7 | 6,131 | 22.3 |
Blue Doll | DP Seed | 51.4 | 5,001 | 20.6 |
Cracker Jack | Sakata | 49.9 | 6,453 | 15.7 |
Eagle City Gold | Rupp | 85.2 | 9,196 | 18.5 |
Gladiator | Harris Moran | 45.9 | 4,840 | 18.9 |
Indian Doll | DP Seed | 56.1 | 6,534 | 17.2 |
Magic Lantern | Harris Moran | 67.8 | 7,341 | 19.2 |
RPX 5956 | Rupp | 57.1 | 8,228 | 13.9 |
Average | 59.5 | 6,505 | 18.5 | |
LSD (0.05) | 23.3 | 2,439 | 3.1 |
Large Size Class (≥ 25.1 lb)
Cultivar |
Seed Company |
Cumulative Yield (tons) / Acre |
Cumulative Number of Fruit / Acre |
Cumulative Average Fruit Weight (lbs) |
Aladdin | Harris Moran | 62.0 | 4,679 | 26.4 |
Cronus | Harris Moran | 64.5 | 4,598 | 28.5 |
Early Giant | Abbott & Cobb | 67.4 | 3,953 | 34.2 |
Early King | Abbott & Cobb | 88.0 | 6,615 | 26.6 |
Hulk | Sakata | 80.4 | 5,485 | 29.1 |
JPN 61560 | Johnny’s Seed | 69.8 | 4,195 | 33.1 |
Average | 72.0 | 4,921 | 29.7 | |
LSD (0.05) | 29.4 | 1,848 | 3.3 |
Table 2.1. Pumpkin cultivar evaluation trial. Fruit and quality measurements for replicated cultivars. Waynesville, NC, 2016.
Cultivar |
FruitColor1 |
FruitShape2 |
FruitSuturing3 |
FruitTexture4 |
VineHabit5 |
*PMRating6 |
ACR 1428 | 7.0 | 5.7 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
ACR 7599 | 6.7 | 5.0 | 5.8 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 5.0 |
Aladdin | 6.7 | 5.7 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 |
Ares | 6.7 | 7.7 | 4.8 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 |
Bayhorse Gold | 6.8 | 5.7 | 5.8 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 8.0 |
Bellatrix | 6.3 | 4.8 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 8.0 |
Blue Doll | NA* | 4.2 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 |
Casparita | 1.0 | 4.2 | 7.7 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 9.0 |
Cracker Jack | 8.0 | 4.8 | 7.7 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Cronus | 6.3 | 5.2 | 6.3 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Darling | 6.0 | 8.2 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Eagle City Gold | 6.0 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Early Abundance | 7.0 | 5.0 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Early Giant | 6.0 | 8.8 | 6.3 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 |
Early King | 6.0 | 6.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Field Trip | 7.0 | 3.7 | 6.3 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 |
Gladiator | 7.0 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 2.0 |
Hulk | 6.7 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 5.0 |
Indian Doll | NA* | 2.7 | 8.3 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 |
Jack Sprat | 6.0 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 7.0 |
JPN 61560 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 7.8 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Magic Lantern | 7.3 | 5.3 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
Orangita | 5.8 | 3.0 | 8.3 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
RPX 5956 | 7.0 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Sirius Star | 1.0 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 |
Average LSD (0.05) |
6.1 0.6 |
5.4 0.8 |
5.8 1.4 |
4.0 2.3 |
3.8 NA |
4.8 NA |
1Color Scale: 1 = yellow, 5 = orange, 9 = burnt orange.
2Fruit Shape Rating: 1 = flat, 5 = round, 9 = tall.
3Fruit Suturing: 1 = none, 5 = medium, 9 = deep.
4Texture Rating: 1 = smooth, 5 = semi-rough, 9= rough.
5Vine Habit: 1 = bush, 2 = semi-bush, 3 = semi-vine, 4 = vine, 5 = aggressive vine
6Powdery Mildew Rating: 1 = None, 9 = Severe
*Observed and rated on 6 September 2016.
Table 2.2 Pumpkin cultivar evaluation trial. Fruit and quality measurements for replicated cultivars. Waynesville, NC, 2016.
Handle7 |
Fruit8 |
|||||
Cultivar |
Thickness |
Length |
Attachment |
Length |
Width |
LD |
ACR 1428 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 6.7 | 7.4 | 8.0 | 0.9 |
ACR 7599 | 7.0 | 4.2 | 7.7 | 9.6 | 11.2 | 0.9 |
Aladdin | 6.0 | 6.3 | 7.0 | 12.3 | 13.6 | 0.9 |
Ares | 9.0 | 7.0 | 7.7 | 14.6 | 12.0 | 1.3 |
Bayhorse Gold | 6.8 | 5.5 | 6.7 | 10.9 | 11.1 | 1.0 |
Bellatrix | 7.7 | 6.5 | 6.0 | 10.6 | 12.9 | 0.8 |
Blue Doll | 7.0 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 8.5 | 11.8 | 0.7 |
Casparita | 5.7 | 7.7 | 6.7 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 0.7 |
Cracker Jack | 6.7 | 5.0 | 7.7 | 10.3 | 11.9 | 0.9 |
Cronus | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 12.8 | 14.8 | 0.9 |
Darling | 7.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 9.2 | 7.2 | 1.3 |
Eagle City Gold | 6.7 | 5.7 | 7.7 | 11.0 | 11.8 | 0.9 |
Early Abundance | 7.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 7.1 | 7.9 | 0.9 |
Early Giant | 8.7 | 3.3 | 8.7 | 17.1 | 14.0 | 1.2 |
Early King | 8.7 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 13.5 | 13.2 | 1.0 |
Field Trip | 6.7 | 9.0 | 6.7 | 5.7 | 7.9 | 0.7 |
Gladiator | 7.7 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 11.3 | 12.2 | 0.9 |
Hulk | 8.0 | 4.0 | 8.7 | 15.5 | 12.9 | 1.2 |
Indian Doll | 5.7 | 3.7 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 12.0 | 0.5 |
Jack Sprat | 7.0 | 6.3 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 6.0 | 0.8 |
JPN 61560 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 13.6 | 13.8 | 1.0 |
Magic Lantern | 6.0 | 6.3 | 7.0 | 11.4 | 12.1 | 0.9 |
Orangita | 5.3 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 0.7 |
RPX 5956 | 7.7 | 4.8 | 5.8 | 8.8 | 10.4 | 0.8 |
Sirius Star | 5.7 | 6.7 | 6.0 | 5.5 | 5.8 | 1.0 |
Average LSD (0.05) |
7.0 0.9 |
5.7 1.4 |
6.5 0.9 |
9.7 1.0 |
10.5 0.8 |
0.9 0.1 |
7Handle Rating:
Thickness: 1 = thin, 5 = medium, 9 = thick.
Length: 1 = short, 5 = medium, 9 = long.
Attachment: 1 = poor, 5 = average, 9 = excellent.
8Fruit Measurements = Individual length and width, values (inches) were taken from 5 fruit per replication, (20 total), The LD ratio was determined by dividing fruit length by fruit width.
*NA = Fruit not orange colored.
Table 3. Pumpkin, Gourd/Winter Squash cultivar evaluation trial. Selected observations (non-replicated cultivars). Cumulative yield (tons) per acre, number fruit per acre and average fruit weight, Waynesville, NC, 2016.
Mini Size Class (≥ 5.0 lb)
Cultivar |
Seed Company |
Yield (tons) / Acre |
Number of Fruit / Acre |
Average Fruit Weight (lbs) |
Autumn Crown | Johnny’s Seed | 3.2 | 37,026 | 3.2 |
Flame | Johnny’s Seed | 1.0 | 24,684 | 1.0 |
Koshare Yellow | Hollar Seed | 1.8 | 23,232 | 1.8 |
Spark | Johnny’s Seed | 0.6 | 65,824 | 0.6 |
Average | 1.7 | 37,692 | 1.7 |
Small Size Class (5.1 – 10.0 lb)
Cultivar |
Seed Company |
Yield (tons) / Acre |
Number of Fruit / Acre |
Average Fruit Weight (lbs) |
Blue Hubbard | Johnny’s Seed | 15.0 | 5,082 | 15.0 |
Flatso | DP Seed | 6.3 | 18,634 | 6.3 |
Kakai | Johnny’s Seed | 6.8 | 11,374 | 6.8 |
Moonshine | Johnny’s Seed | 7.7 | 7,986 | 7.7 |
Sunshine | Johnny’s Seed | 5.5 | 10,164 | 5.5 |
Triamble | Johnny’s Seed | 9.4 | 5,324 | 9.4 |
Turks Turban | Johnny’s Seed | 6.4 | 8,470 | 6.4 |
Average | 8.2 | 9,576 | 8.2 |
Medium Size Class (10.1 – 25.0 lb)
Cultivar |
Seed Company |
Yield (tons) / Acre |
Number of Fruit / Acre |
Average Fruit Weight (lbs) |
Marina Di Chioggia | Johnny’s Seed | 17.3 | 2,178 | 17.3 |
Kratos | Harris Moran | 21.3 | 7,744 | 21.3 |
One Too Many | Rupp | 24.7 | 5,324 | 24.7 |
New England Cheddar | Johnny’s Seed | 19.7 | 3,630 | 19.7 |
Rhea | Johnny’s Seed | 73.9 | 7,018 | 21.1 |
Warty Goblin | Harris Moran | 19.5 | 6,292 | 19.5 |
Average | 29.4 | 5,497 | 20.6 |
Large Size Class (≥ 25.0 lb)
Cultivar |
Seed Company |
Yield (tons) / Acre |
Number of Fruit / Acre |
Average Fruit Weight (lbs) |
Full Moon | Hollar Seed | 43.6 | 2,904 | 61.5 |
Average | 43.6 | 2,904 | 61.5 |
Table 4.2. Pumpkin, Gourd/Winter Squash cultivar evaluation trial. Fruit and quality measurements for selected observation replicated cultivars. Waynesville, NC, 2016.
Cultivar |
Fruit Color1 |
Fruit Shape2 |
FruitSuturing3 |
Vine Habit4 |
*PM Rating5 |
Autumn Crown | Buff | 2.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Blue Hubbard | Blue | NA* | 3.0 | 1.0 | NA* |
Flame | Ylw, Orng & Wht | 3.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 5.0 |
Flatso | 5.5 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Full Moon | White | NA* | NA* | NA* | NA* |
Kakai | 5.0 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 |
Koshare Yellow | Green & Yellow | NA* | NA* | NA* | NA* |
Kratos | 7.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 |
Marina Di Chioggia | Blue | 2.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
Moonshine | 1.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 |
New England Cheddar | Buff | 4.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 |
One Too Many | 1.0 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Rhea | 6.0 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 2.0 |
Spark | 1.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 |
Sunshine | 9.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 |
Triamble | Blue | 3.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 |
Turks Turban | Grn, Red & White | NA* | NA* | NA* | NA* |
Warty Goblin | 7.5 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 2.0 |
Average | 4.8 | 4.1 | 5.8 | 4.9 | 3.3 |
1Color Scale: 1 = yellow, 5 = orange, 9 = burnt orange.
2Fruit Shape Rating: 1 = flat, 5 = round, 9 = tall.
3Fruit Suturing: 1 = none, 5 = medium, 9 = deep.
4Vine Habit: 1 = bush, 2 = semi-bush, 3 = semi-vine, 4 = vine, 5 = aggressive vine
5Powdery Mildew Rating: 1 = None, 9 = Severe; *Observed and rated on 6 September 2016.
*NA = Data not available.
Table 4.2. Pumpkin, Gourd/Winter Squash cultivar evaluation trial. Fruit and quality measurements for selected observation replicated cultivars. Waynesville, NC, 2016.
Cultivar |
Handle Thickness6 |
HandleLength7 |
HandleAttachment8 |
Fruit Length9 |
FruitWidth9 |
FruitLD10 |
Autumn Crown | 3.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 6.8 | 0.5 |
Blue Hubbard | 9.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 15.9 | 9.9 | 1.6 |
Flame | 5.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 0.7 |
Flatso | 2.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 8.1 | 0.7 |
Full Moon | NA* | NA* | NA* | 15.9 | 16.7 | 1.0 |
Kakai | 1.0 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 7.2 | 8.3 | 0.9 |
Koshare Yellow | NA* | NA* | NA* | NA* | NA* | NA* |
Kratos | 5.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 11.8 | 13.3 | 0.9 |
Marina Di Chioggia | 9.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 6.4 | 11.4 | 0.6 |
Moonshine | 2.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 7.6 | 9.5 | 0.8 |
New England Cheddar | 1.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 8.6 | 12.2 | 0.7 |
One Too Many | 7.0 | 1.0 | 6.5 | 12.2 | 14.5 | 0.8 |
Rhea | 5.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 10.4 | 13.0 | 0.8 |
Spark | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 0.6 |
Sunshine | 7.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | 4.7 | 8.3 | 0.6 |
Triamble | 5.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 10.2 | 0.6 |
Turks Turban | NA* | NA* | NA* | 5.6 | 8.7 | 0.6 |
Warty Goblin | 9.0 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 10.7 | 11.6 | 0.9 |
Average | 5.1 | 5.2 | 6.4 | 8.1 | 10.0 | 0.8 |
6Handle Thickness: 1 = thin, 5 = medium, 9 = thick.
7Handle Length: 1 = short, 5 = medium, 9 = long.
8Handle Attachment: 1 = poor, 5 = average, 9 = excellent.
9Fruit Measurements = Individual length and width
values (inches) were taken from 5 fruit per replication, (20 total), 10The LD ratio was determined by dividing fruit length by fruit width.